Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 81 against 76.2. The Galaxy XCover Pro design weights the same than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is a little thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, giving lots of additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit inferior pixels number per inch of display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and a lot higher video definition.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.