Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having an 88.5 score against 76.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features. Although the Galaxy Z Flip and nubia Red Magic 5S were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip is way thinner and somewhat lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit lower pixel number per inch in the screen, they both have a same size display. Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The nubia Red Magic 5S features improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 5S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.