Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, offering a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is newer, somewhat lighter and notably thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 and nubia Red Magic 5S have really similar CPUs, both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a just a little inferior pixels number per inch of display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, they both have a display with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has as much storage capacity to install games and applications as nubia Red Magic 5S, both have the same internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 5S has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.