Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and a lot thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, counting with some additional features.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit less pixels per inch of display, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better performance than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more memory for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.