Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZs has a global score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. Xperia XZs is an incredibly older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but Sony managed to build it a lot lighter and thinner. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little more vivid display than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Xperia XZs shoots just a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it has a camera with way less megapixels, a lot smaller sensor taking much worse quality videos and images, a smaller camera aperture and a much lower video definition.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs more money than nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the nubia Red Magic 5S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZs, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the nubia Red Magic 5S, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.