Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. Despite of the fact that the Sony Xperia Z4v is way older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but Sony Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a brighter display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Xperia Z4v is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.