Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.08 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 545.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 3840 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 10.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 630 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z5 Premium has a score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Xperia Z5 Premium has the older 5.1 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Although the Xperia Z5 Premium is extremely older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium counts with a lot better display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a way better 3840 x 2160 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more powerful processor than Xperia Z5 Premium, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery performance than Sony Xperia Z5 Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 5S takes better photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z5 Premium, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.