Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's a bit thinner and lighter anyway.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a processor that's very similar to nubia Red Magic 5S's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with more screen brightness and a bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5S one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos, a way higher video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.