Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is way older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a CPU that is very similar to the processor in nubia Red Magic 5S, they have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a camera with much more megapixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 32% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.