Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a newer 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features and enhanced performance. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a newer and extremely thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it is a little bit heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a way better 2224 x 2488 resolution, a really brighter display, a quite greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures just a bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much greater storage for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has just a bit longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.