Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 87.9 against 76.2. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a a bit thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 5S, although both of them were released only 4 months apart. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and nubia Red Magic 5S have quite similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more brightness, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features as much storage for applications and games as the nubia Red Magic 5S, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 4% larger battery size. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.