Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 80.2 score against 76.2. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released just 16 months before.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger display. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little longer battery duration than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better camera than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a much better video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro costs a bit more money than nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.