Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a global score of 76.6, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features and increased performance. Although ZTE Axon 10s Pro and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released with a couple months difference, ZTE Axon 10s Pro is thinner and a lot lighter.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro's processor is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5S one, and although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a lot better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a camera with a much better resolution and a much higher video resolution. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior battery performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.