Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-01-31 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.23 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is better than the nubia Red Magic Mars, with an 80 score against 69.7. Although Motorola One Zoom and nubia Red Magic Mars were only released 7 months apart, Motorola One Zoom is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. The nubia Red Magic Mars has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display.
The nubia Red Magic Mars has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic Mars also has more RAM memory. The Motorola One Zoom has a superior camera than nubia Red Magic Mars, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic Mars, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic Mars, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Motorola One Zoom costs a bit more than the nubia Red Magic Mars, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.