Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-01-31 | 2019-12-06 |
| 6.23 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Papaya orange |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is better than the nubia Red Magic Mars, with a overall score of 80.1 against 69.7. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren's body is newer and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic Mars's, although it's also a little bit heavier. These devices have Android OS, but OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic Mars has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a bit better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic Mars, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has 4 GB more RAM. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic Mars, because it has a better screen density, a little bit bigger display and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren captures better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic Mars, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic Mars, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren counts with a bit better battery performance than nubia Red Magic Mars, because it has a 4085mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is also cheaper than the nubia Red Magic Mars, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.