Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-01-31 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.23 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 449.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a general score of 76.5, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic Mars's 69.7 general score. Although Xiaomi Mi 6 is older than nubia Red Magic Mars, it's construction is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter. Xiaomi Mi 6 has a slightly better display than nubia Red Magic Mars, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
Nubia Red Magic Mars features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic Mars also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic Mars has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic Mars also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Mi 6 has as much storage for applications and games as the nubia Red Magic Mars one, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic Mars has a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 3800mAh battery capacity against 3350mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi 6 is also cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.