Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is better than nubia Z20, having a global score of 80.2 against 71.9. Google Pixel is an a lot older phone than the nubia Z20, but it's much lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. The nubia Z20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Google Pixel has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the nubia Z20, they have the same internal storage capacity. Nubia Z20 has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Z20 features a superior camera than Google Pixel, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a lot higher video quality and a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Nubia Z20 counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.