Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is better than nubia Z20's general score of 71.9. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the nubia Z20, although it was released 2 years before. Nubia Z20 features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Z20 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a little more vivid screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 2 XL has as much storage capacity for games and applications as nubia Z20, both have equal internal memory capacity.
The nubia Z20 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a way better video resolution, a much higher resolution camera in the back, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos. Nubia Z20 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.