Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than the nubia Z20, getting a overall score of 80 against 71.9. The Google Pixel 3 construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Z20, even though it was released just a bit more than a year before. The nubia Z20 counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Z20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Z20 features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger screen. The nubia Z20 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The nubia Z20 counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. Nubia Z20 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.