Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than the nubia Z20's 71.9 general score. Google Pixel 3 XL's body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Z20, even though it was released just 12 months before. Nubia Z20 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Z20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Z20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960px resolution. The nubia Z20 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Z20 has just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% more battery size. The nubia Z20 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.