Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than nubia Z20, with an 81.9 score against 71.9. Google Pixel 4's design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than nubia Z20, although both were only released with a couple months difference. The nubia Z20 has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Z20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 and nubia Z20 count with very similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch of display. Nubia Z20 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a much higher video quality, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Nubia Z20 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory. Nubia Z20 has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Google Pixel 4 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.