Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than nubia Z20, having a general score of 82.9 against 71.9. Although the Google Pixel 4 XL and nubia Z20 were released with only 0 months difference, the Google Pixel 4 XL design is just a little heavier but also just a bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Nubia Z20 features much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Nubia Z20 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Z20 has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The nubia Z20 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a much better video definition.
The Google Pixel 4 XL is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.