Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is much better than the nubia Z20's 71.9 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it is also much lighter and just a bit thinner than nubia Z20.
The nubia Z20 has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit worse display density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Z20 also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Google Pixel 4a's memory for apps and games is very similar to nubia Z20's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Z20 counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Z20 shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a way better video definition, a lot larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Nubia Z20 has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4a is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.