Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the nubia Z20's global score of 71.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is newer, just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the nubia Z20. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Z20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Z20 also counts with a quite larger screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G's storage to install games and applications is just as good as nubia Z20's one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory.
Nubia Z20 has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Z20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Z20 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3885mAh. Nubia Z20 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.