Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a bit better than nubia Z20, with a 77.6 score against 71.9. Although the HTC U11 is noticeably older than the nubia Z20, it's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. HTC U11 has a little sharper display than nubia Z20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The nubia Z20 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Z20 captures better photographs and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Nubia Z20 features slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Nubia Z20 has greater battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
HTC U11 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.