Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is better than nubia Z20, having an 81 score against 71.9. LG G7 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Z20, even though it was released about 17 months before. Both phones we are comparing use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both of them should provide the user the same OS features.
The nubia Z20 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Z20 also has a greater amount of RAM. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better display than nubia Z20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The nubia Z20 has a little bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much better video definition. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Z20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Z20 has superior battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.