Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Titan gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than the nubia Z20, getting an 85.4 score against 71.9. The LG K92 construction is newer and a little thinner, but just a little heavier than nubia Z20. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG K92 has an older 10 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Nubia Z20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Z20 has a little sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixels density. LG K92 shoots clearer photographs and videos than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same sensor size and the same video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The LG K92 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 has a battery duration that is very similar to the nubia Z20 one.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG K92 is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.