Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is better than nubia Z20's overall score of 71.9. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has the previous 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the nubia Z20, but LG was able to make it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Nubia Z20 features a bit better CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Z20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Z20 has superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
The nubia Z20 takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ costs a lot more money than the nubia Z20, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.