Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is better than nubia Z20, having an 81.2 score against 71.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG V40 ThinQ body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than the nubia Z20, although it was released just a bit over a year before.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than nubia Z20, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better pixels density. LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Z20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The nubia Z20 counts with a little faster CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Z20 also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Z20 has better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Nubia Z20 takes clearer videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.