Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is better than nubia Z20's 71.9 score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a just a little thinner device than nubia Z20, but both have the same weight.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter display than nubia Z20, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite bigger display and much more display brightness. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Z20, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The nubia Z20 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a way larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos, higher video frame rates and a more mega pixels back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.