Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is much better than nubia Z20, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 71.9. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola One Hyper is a just a little heavier phone than the nubia Z20, but they have the same thickness.
Nubia Z20 features just a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Z20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Z20 also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper features a battery lifetime that's very similar to the nubia Z20 one.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a little bit better camera than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with faster video frame rates and a way better resolution camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola One Hyper is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.