Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is just a bit better than nubia Z20, getting a 76.1 score against 71.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A22 has an older 12 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A22 is a just a little bit thinner phone than nubia Z20, but they have equal weights.
The nubia Z20 has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Z20 also has a greater amount of RAM. The nubia Z20 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the nubia Z20 also has a better pixel density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The nubia Z20 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Z20 also has a bigger aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A22 features much more storage to install applications and games than nubia Z20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The nubia Z20 has a way better battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.