Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is better than nubia Z20's global score of 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the nubia Z20, although it is just a bit heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Z20 has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking display than nubia Z20, because although it has a little worse pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much brighter display and a quite larger display.
The nubia Z20 features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G features improved battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.