Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than nubia Z20's overall score of 71.9. Even when Samsung Galaxy A50 and the nubia Z20 were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy A50 is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Nubia Z20 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has more RAM memory.
The nubia Z20 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50. They have the same display pixels density, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Z20 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a way better video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a battery performance that's very similar to nubia Z20's battery life.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.