Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is way better than nubia Z20's 71.9 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A50s design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the nubia Z20, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Z20 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Z20 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s. Both have a display of the same size, the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s takes slightly better photographs and videos than nubia Z20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, a same size back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with higher video frame rates.
Galaxy A50s counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery duration in nubia Z20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.