Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than nubia Z20's 71.9 score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than the nubia Z20, although it's also just a bit heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Z20 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller screen. The nubia Z20 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Z20 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better camera than nubia Z20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos, faster video frame rate and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Z20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features just a little better battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.