Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is way better than the nubia Z20, with a global score of 88.1 against 71.9. Galaxy F62's design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than nubia Z20. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has 11 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The nubia Z20 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The nubia Z20 and the Galaxy F62 feature extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy F62 has a just a little less pixels per display inch and a little bit darker screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy F62 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and better 30 fps video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Z20, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery duration than nubia Z20, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.