Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the nubia Z20's 71.9 overall score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra construction has the same thickness than the nubia Z20, but it is heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Z20 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better looking display than nubia Z20, because it has a much brighter screen, a just a little higher pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
Nubia Z20 and Galaxy S22 Ultra count with quite similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both have the same internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera, better 24 frames per second video frame rate and a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery life than nubia Z20, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way more expensive than the nubia Z20, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.