Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-14 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than nubia Z20's 71.9 global score. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and lighter device than nubia Z20.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better screen than nubia Z20, because it has a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a lot brighter display and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than nubia Z20, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
Nubia Z20 features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than nubia Z20, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way better 200 MP resolution back-facing camera, faster video frame rates and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.