Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is much better than nubia Z20's 71.9 general score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it is also extremely heavier and notably thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has older 8.0 Oreo version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Z20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better display than nubia Z20, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The nubia Z20 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a much more megapixels camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Z20, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the nubia Z20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as nubia Z20. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the nubia Z20, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.