Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than nubia Z20, having an 81 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is somewhat heavier and thicker than nubia Z20.
Nubia Z20 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Z20 also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Z20 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Z20 also counts with a little bigger screen.
The nubia Z20 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a much better video definition. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Z20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.