Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way better than nubia Z20, with an 88.5 score against 71.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the nubia Z20 were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's processor is very similar to the processing unit in nubia Z20, both of them have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Nubia Z20 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower pixel density, a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Z20, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Z20 has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Nubia Z20 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher resolution back camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a much higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way more expensive than nubia Z20, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.