Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than nubia Z20, with an 85.6 score against 71.9. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 body is newer, just a little lighter and way thinner than the nubia Z20.
Nubia Z20 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit worse pixels density and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Galaxy Z Flip 3 and nubia Z20 both count with incredibly similar storage to install applications and games, both have equal internal storage capacity.
Nubia Z20 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. Nubia Z20 takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and a much higher 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The nubia Z20 has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more money than nubia Z20, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.