Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the nubia Z20's score of 71.9. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and incredibly thinner, but also a lot heavier than the nubia Z20.
Nubia Z20 has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than nubia Z20, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processing power than nubia Z20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM. The nubia Z20 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photos, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with way more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than nubia Z20, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.