Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than nubia Z20's 71.9 global score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and much thinner phone than the nubia Z20, but it is also incredibly heavier.
The nubia Z20 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than nubia Z20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a processing unit that is just as good as nubia Z20's processor, and although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than nubia Z20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Z20 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.