Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has an overall score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the nubia Z20's 71.9 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the TCL 20 Pro 5G has older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The TCL 20 Pro 5G design is newer than nubia Z20's, although it's a little bit thicker and a bit heavier.
The nubia Z20 features a little bit better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display. The nubia Z20 has a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Z20 also has more RAM.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than nubia Z20, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rate.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.