Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is better than the nubia Z20's 71.9 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a somewhat heavier phone than nubia Z20, but both of them are 0.35inches thick.
Nubia Z20 counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. Nubia Z20 has a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a slightly better camera than nubia Z20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor, a way higher resolution back facing camera and better video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Z20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has improved battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.