Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Ochre and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a score of 76.6, which is slightly better than the nubia Z20's global score of 71.9. Both of these phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. ZTE Axon 10s Pro is a a little lighter and thinner phone than the nubia Z20, although both of them were only released 4 months apart.
Nubia Z20 counts with a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Z20 also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per inch in the screen. Nubia Z20 has a bit more powerful processor than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has more RAM.
The nubia Z20 captures much clearer photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size back-facing camera sensor and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in nubia Z20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.