Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-11-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Purple | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 208.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than OnePlus 6T, having an 80.1 score against 72.9. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer device than OnePlus 6T, although it's way heavier and noticeably thicker. The OnePlus 6T counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OnePlus 6T also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper display than OnePlus 6T, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. OnePlus 6T features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality photos and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The OnePlus 6T has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery duration than OnePlus 6T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the OnePlus 6T, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the OnePlus 6T. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the OnePlus 6T, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.