Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-17 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Almond, Mirror gray and Nebula blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 302.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 513 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is much better than the OnePlus 7 Pro's 72.3 global score. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is newer, but notably thicker and somewhat heavier than OnePlus 7 Pro. OnePlus 7 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OnePlus 7 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid display than OnePlus 7 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. OnePlus 7 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than OnePlus 7 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery performance than OnePlus 7 Pro, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than OnePlus 7 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the OnePlus 7 Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can get OnePlus 7 Pro, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.